UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

FORM 10 - Q

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to ___________

Commission File Number 0-51481

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (i) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ý  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ý  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)

Yes ☐  No ý

The number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock as of May 13, 2016 was 10,587,804 shares.

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – Financial Information

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

 

		For the Three Months Ended March 31,
		2016				2015
Revenues		$	7,620			$	81
Cost of revenues			3,422				711
Gross profit (loss)			4,198				(630	)
Operating expenses:
Engineering and product development			525				239
Selling and marketing			3,710				1,027
General and administrative			2,101				1,736
			6,336				3,002
Operating loss before other income (expense), net			(2,138	)			(3,632	)
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense, net			(1,218	)			(2,324	)
Change in fair value of warrant liability			1,985				(1,334	)
Other income, net			-				18
			767				(3,640	)
Loss before income taxes			(1,371	)			(7,272	)
Income tax expense			(66	)			-
Net loss		$	(1,437	)		$	(7,272	)
Net loss per share:
Basic		$	(0.14	)		$	(1.12	)
Diluted		$	(0.26	)		$	(1.12	)
Shares used in computing net loss per share:
Basic			10,339,657				6,471,906
Diluted			13,307,923				6,471,906

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2016

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

		Convertible Preferred Stock								Common Stock								Additional Paid-In				Accumulated				Accumulated Other Comprehensive
		Shares				Amount				Shares				Amount				Capital				Deficit				Loss				Total
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2016			6,505			$	1				10,283,393			$	10			$	223,315			$	(207,240	)		$	1			$	16,087
Stock-based compensation			-				-				-				-				170				-				-				170
Conversion of senior secured convertible debentures			-				-				220,000				1				164				-				-				165
Warrants issued in connection with debt			-				-				-				-				47				-				-				47
Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2016			-				-				-				-				-				(1,437	)			-				(1,437	)
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2016			6,505			$	1				10,503,393			$	11			$	223,696			$	(208,677	)		$	1			$	15,032

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands, unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

 

 

Note 1

The Company:

Background

STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (and its subsidiary) ("STRATA" or "we" or the "Company") is a medical technology company dedicated to developing and commercializing innovative products for the diagnosis and treatment of serious dermatological disorders. In June 2015 the Company completed the acquisition of the XTRAC Excimer Laser and the VTRAC excimer lamp businesses from PhotoMedex, Inc. which included a subsidiary in India, PhotoMedex India Ltd. The XTRAC® and VTRAC® products are FDA cleared devices for the treatment of psoriasis, vitiligo and other skin disorders. The purchase price was $42,500 plus the assumption of certain business-related liabilities. Management believes that the cash flow generated by these businesses will be sufficient to finance the Company's operations for the foreseeable future. (See Note 2, Acquisition.)

The XTRAC is an ultraviolet light excimer laser system utilized to treat psoriasis, vitiligo and other skin diseases. The XTRAC received FDA clearance in 2000 and has since become a recognized treatment among dermatologists. The system delivers targeted 308um ultraviolet light to affected areas of the skin, leading to psoriasis clearing and vitiligo repigmentation, following a series of treatments. As of March 31, 2016, there were 730 XTRAC systems placed in dermatologists' offices in the United States under the Company's recurring revenue business model. The XTRAC systems employed under the recurring revenue model generate revenue on a per procedure basis. The per-procedure charge is inclusive of the use of the system and the services provided by the Company to the customer which includes system maintenance, reimbursement support service and participation in the direct to patient marketing programs employed by the Company. The XTRAC system's use for psoriasis is covered by nearly all major insurance companies, including Medicare. The VTRAC Excimer Lamp system, offered in addition to the XTRAC system internationally, provides targeted therapeutic efficacy demonstrated by excimer technology with the simplicity of design and reliability of a lamp system.

Liquidity

As of March 31, 2016, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $208,677 and has incurred losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception. To date, the Company has dedicated most of its financial resources to research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses.

The Company has been dependent on raising capital from the sale of securities in order to continue to operate and to meet its obligations in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that its cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2016 combined with the anticipated revenues from the sale of the Company's products will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs, capital asset purchases, outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations through the second quarter of 2017.

Basis of Presentation:

Accounting Principles

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP").

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

 

Quarterly Financial Information and Results of Operations

The condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2016 and for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position as of March 31, 2016,  the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the statement of stockholders' equity for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and the statement of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. The results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 was derived from audited financial statements as of December 31, 2015. While management of the Company believes that the disclosures presented are adequate to make the information not misleading, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with audited consolidated financial statements and the footnotes thereto, together with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. 

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications from the prior year presentation have been made to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications did not have a material impact on the Company's equity, net assets, results of operations or cash flows.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the US requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates and be based on events different from those assumptions. As of March 31, 2016, the more significant estimates include (1) revenue recognition, including deferred revenues and valuation allowances of accounts receivable, (2) the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the business combination, (3) the estimated useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, (4) the inputs used in determining the fair value of equity-based awards and (5) the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company measures and discloses fair value in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC Topic 820"). ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions there exists a three-tier fair-value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value.

 

 

The Company's recurring fair value measurements at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows:

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents are based on their respective demand value, which are equal to the carrying value. The fair value of derivative warrant liabilities is estimated using option pricing models that are based on the individual characteristics of the Company's warrants, preferred and common stock, the derivative warrant liability on the valuation date as well as assumptions for volatility, remaining expected life, risk-free interest rate and, in some cases, credit spread. The derivative warrant liabilities are the only recurring Level 3 fair value measures. The carrying value of all other short-term monetary assets and liabilities is estimated to be approximate to their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company assessed its convertible debentures and long-term debt and determined that the fair value of total debt was $18,251 as of March 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2015 the fair value of total debt approximated the recorded value of $15,958.

Several of the warrants have non-standard terms as they relate to a fundamental transaction and require a net-cash settlement upon change in control of the Company and other warrants contain full ratchet provisions that reduce the exercise price of the warrants in the event of a transaction resulting in the issuance of equity below the current price of the warrants. Therefore these warrants are classified as derivatives. These warrants have been recorded at their fair value using a binomial option pricing model and will be recorded at their respective fair value at each subsequent balance sheet date. See Note 10, Warrants, for additional discussion.

Accrued Warranty Costs

The Company offers a standard warranty on product sales generally for a one to two-year period The Company provides for the estimated cost of the future warranty claims on the date the product is sold. Total accrued warranty is included in Other Accrued Liabilities and Other liabilities on the balance sheet. The activity in the warranty accrual during the three months ended March 31, 2016 is summarized as follows:

 

Earnings Per Share

Basic net loss per common share excludes dilution for potentially dilutive securities and is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share gives effect to dilutive options, warrants and other potential common shares outstanding during the period and their potential diluted effect is considered using the treasury method.

For the three months ended March 31, 2016 diluted earnings per common share are computed by the numerator effected by the gain on the change in fair value of the warrant liability and the denominator is increased to include the number of additional potential common shares from the warrants underlying the warrant liability.

Diluted earnings per common share were calculated using the following net loss and weighted average shares outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2016:

		March 31, 2016
Net loss		$	(1,437	)
Gain on the change in fair value of the warrant liability			(1,985	)
Diluted earnings		$	(3,422	)
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
Basic number of common shares outstanding			10,339,657
Dilutive effect of warrants			2,968,266
Diluted number of common and common stock equivalent shares outstanding			13,307,923

For the three months ended March 31, 2015, diluted net loss per common share is equal to the basic net loss per common share since all potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive. The loss on the change in fair value of the warrant liability would be considered in the diluted earnings per share calculation and was deemed to be antidilutive.

Potential common stock equivalents outstanding as of March 31, 2016 and 2015 consist of common stock equivalents of common stock purchase warrants, senior secured convertible debentures, convertible preferred stock and common stock options, which are summarized as follows:

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" (Subtopic 835-30). ASU No. 2015-03 provides guidance that will require debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, in the same manner as debt discounts, rather than as an asset. The standard was effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and early adoption was permitted. The Company adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2016. (See Note 8, Convertible Debentures.)

 

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments." The amendments in ASU 2015-16 require that an acquirer recognize adjustments to estimated amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined, rather than retrospectively adjusting amounts previously reported. The amendments require that the acquirer record, in the same period's financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the estimated amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. Effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments should be applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occur after the effective date with earlier application permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, This statement requires lessees to present right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. The standard is effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the guidance will have on its financial condition and results of operations.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes topic of the Codification. This standard requires all deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as non-current on the balance sheet instead of separating deferred taxes into current and non-current amounts. In addition, valuation allowance allocations between current and non-current deferred tax assets are no longer required because those allowances also will be classified as non-current. This standard is effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and March 31, 2016. The Company's deferred tax assets is provided with full valuation allowance as of December 31, 2015. As such, the Company does not expect that this standard will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures upon adoption.

In July, 2015, The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330) ("ASU 2015-11"). ASU 2015-11 outlines that inventory within the scope of its guidance be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Inventory measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) are not impacted by the new guidance. Prior to the issuance of ASU 2015-11, inventory was measured at the lower of cost or market (where market was defined as replacement cost, with a ceiling of net realizable value and floor of net realizable value less a normal profit margin). For a public entity, the amendments in ASU 2015-11 are effective, in a prospective manner, for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period (the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 for the Company). Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company is in the process of assessing the impact, if any, of ASU 2015-11 on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) ("ASU 2014-09"). ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 also requires entities to disclose sufficient information, both quantitative and qualitative, to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. An entity should apply the amendments in this ASU using one of the following two methods: 1. Retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented with a possibility to elect certain practical expedients, or, 2. Retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application. If an entity elects the latter transition method, it also should provide certain additional disclosures. For a public entity, the amendments in ASU 2014-09 were to be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. In July 2015, the FASB voted for a one year deferral of the effective date of ASU 2014-09 and issued an exposure draft. The new guidance will be effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that adopting this new accounting guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern ("ASU 2014-15"). ASU 2014-15 provides guidance on management's responsibility in evaluating whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). ASU 2014-15 also provides guidance related to the required disclosures as a result of management evaluation. The amendments in ASU 2014-15 are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company's results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

Note 2

Acquisition:

On June 22, 2015, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement (the "Asset Purchase Agreement") with PhotoMedex Inc. and PhotoMedex Technology, Inc. pursuant to which the Company has purchased the XTRAC and VTRAC laser businesses from PhotoMedex, Inc. (the "Asset Purchase") for $42,528 in cash and assumed certain business-related liabilities. The purchased assets include all of the accounts receivable, inventory and fixed and intangible assets of the business.

The fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were based on management. The significant intangible assets to be recognized in the valuation are core and product technologies, tradenames and customer relationships. The estimated useful lives over which these assets will be amortized, utilizing the straight line method, are five years for product technologies and ten years for core technologies, tradenames and customer relationships. The following allocation of the aggregate fair value is subject to adjustment based on the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. The Company estimated fair value of the intangibles and lasers placed in service was based on the income approach which estimated cash flow that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known trends and specific market and economic conditions. The fair value of the Company's remaining fixed assets was estimated based on the cost approach which estimated the cost to replace.

The purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net assets acquired by $8,928, which was recorded as goodwill.

 

The consolidated results of operations do not include any revenues or expenses related to XTRAC and VTRAC businesses on or prior to June 22, 2015, the date of the asset purchase. The Company's unaudited pro-forma results for the three months ended March 31, 2015 summarize the combined results in the following table, assuming the asset purchase had occurred on January 1, 2015 and after giving effect to the acquisition adjustments, including amortization of the tangible and long-lived intangible assets acquired in the transaction:

These unaudited pro-forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the results of operations which would have actually resulted had the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2014, nor to be indicative of future results of operations.

Note 3

Inventories, net:

Work-in-process is immaterial, given the Company's typically short manufacturing cycle, and therefore is disclosed in conjunction with raw materials.

Note 4

Property and Equipment, net:

Depreciation and related amortization expense was $1,230 and $41 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Note 5

Patents and Licensed Technologies, net:

Related amortization expense was $244 and $1 for each of the three month ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Estimated amortization expense for amortizable patents and licensed technologies assets for the future periods is as follows:

Note 6

Other Intangible Assets:

Set forth below is a detailed listing of other definite-lived intangible assets:

Related amortization expense was $210 and $ 0 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for the above amortizable intangible assets for the future periods is as follows:

Note 7

Other Accrued Liabilities:

Note 8

Convertible Debentures:

In the following table is a summary of the Company's convertible debentures.

The Company issued $32,500 aggregate principal amount of Debentures (June 2015 Debentures) that, subject to certain ownership limitations and stockholder approval conditions, will be convertible into 43,333,334 shares of Company common stock at an initial conversion price of $0.75 per share. The Debentures bear interest at the rate of 2.25% per year, and, unless previously converted, will mature on the five-year anniversary of the date of issuance, June 22, 2020.

The June 2015 Debentures include a beneficial conversion feature valued at $27,300 that was recorded as a discount to the debentures. On the date of issuance the beneficial conversion feature value was calculated as the difference resulting from subtracting the conversion price of $0.75 from $1.38, the opening market value of the Company's common stock following the announcement of the transaction, multiplied by the number of common shares into which the June 2015 Debentures are convertible. This discount is being amortized over the five year life of the June 2015 Debentures using the effective interest method. The embedded conversion feature contains an anti-dilution provision that allows for downward exercise price adjustments in certain situations. The embedded conversion feature was not bifurcated as it did not meet all of the elements of a derivative.

 

On July 21, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive Securities Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") with institutional investors (the "Investors") providing for the issuance of Senior Secured Convertible Debentures in the aggregate principal amount of $15,000, due, subject to the terms therein, in July 2019 (the "July 2014 Debentures"), and warrants (the "July 2014 Series A Warrants") to purchase up to an aggregate of 6,198,832 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, at an exercise price of $2.45 per share expiring in July 2019. The July 2014 Debentures bear interest at an annual rate of 4%, payable quarterly or upon conversion into shares of common stock. The Debentures are convertible at any time into an aggregate of 5,847,955 shares of common stock at an initial conversion price of $2.565 per share. The Company's obligations under the July 2014 Debentures are secured by a first priority lien on all of the Company's intellectual property pursuant to the terms of a security agreement ("Security Agreement") dated July 21, 2014 among the Company and the Investors. In connection with the Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the Investors pursuant to which the Company was obligated to file a registration statement to register for resale the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock (See Note 10, Warrants) and Debentures and upon exercise of the Warrants. Under the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company filed a registration statement on August 19, 2014, which was declared effective by the SEC on October 20, 2014 (File No. 333-198249).

For financial reporting purposes, the $15,000 funded by the Investors on July 21, 2014 was allocated first to the fair value of the obligation to issue the Warrants, amounting to $5,296, then to the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature on the July 2014 Debentures of $4,565. The balance was further reduced by the fair value of warrants issued to the placement agent for services rendered of $491, resulting in an initial carrying value of the Debentures of $4,647. The initial debt discount on the July 2014 Debentures totaled $10,353 and is being amortized using the effective interest method over the five year life of the July 2014 Debentures.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the investors converted debentures amounting to $165 into 220,000 shares of common stock for the June 2015 note. The debt discount and deferred financing cost adjustment resulting from the conversions increased interest expense by $136 for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

As a condition of the new note facility (See Note 9, Long-term Debt) the Debentures from both the 2014 and 2015 financings were amended. The Debentures holders' first priority lien was subordinated to the new term note facility. Additionally, as a condition of the term note facility, the maturity date of both Debentures was extended to June 30, 2021. The Company evaluated the modifications to determine if there was an extinguishment of debt. Based on the valuation, the discounted cash flows did not change by more than 10%, thus they were treated as a modification.

As of March 31, 2016, the total outstanding amount of Debentures was $40,828.

Note 9

Long-term Debt:

Term-Note Credit Facility

On December 30, 2015, the Company entered into a $12,000 credit facility pursuant to a Credit and Security Agreement (the "Agreement") and related financing documents with MidCap Financial Trust ("MidCap") and the lenders listed therein. Under the Agreement, the credit facility may be drawn down in two tranches, the first of which was drawn for $10,500 on December 30, 2015. The proceeds of this first tranche were used to repay $10,000 principal amount of short-term senior secured promissory notes, plus associated interest, loan fees and expenses. The second tranche was drawn for $1,500 on January 29, 2016. The Company's obligations under the credit facility are secured by a first priority lien on all of the Company's assets. This credit facility includes both financial and non-financial covenants, including a minimum net revenue covenant, beginning in January 2016. The Company is in compliance with these covenants as of March 31, 2016. Interest rate on the credit facility is one month LIBOR plus 8.25%, subject to a LIBOR floor of 0.5%. The Company's existing debentures from its 2014 and 2015 financings were amended as a condition of this new term note facility, including subordination agreements and maturity extensions. As of March 31, 2016 the net balance of long-term debt is $11,344.

 

 

In connection with the issuance of the Term Note the Company issued MidCap (and the lenders), on December 30, 2015, a warrant to purchase 650,442 shares of the Company's common stock for an exercise price of $1.13. Additionally, the Company issued MidCap (and the lenders), on January 29, 2016, a warrant to purchase 99,057 shares of the Company's common stock for an exercise price of $1.06. The warrants are exercisable at any time on or prior to the fifth anniversary of its issue date. The warrants are treated as a discount to the debt and are accreted under the effective interest method over the repayment term of 60 months. The Company has accounted for these warrants as equity instruments since there is no option for cash or net-cash settlement when the warrants are exercised and since they are indexed to the Company's common stock. The Company computed the value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes method. The key assumptions used to value the warrants are as follows:

Note 10

Warrants:

The Company accounts for warrants that have provisions that protect holders from a decline in the issue price of its common stock (or "down-round" provisions) as liabilities instead of equity. Down-round provisions reduce the exercise or conversion price of a warrant or convertible instrument if a company either issues equity shares for a price that is lower than the exercise or conversion price of those instruments or issues new warrants or convertible instruments that have a lower exercise or conversion price. Net settlement provisions allow the holder of the warrant to surrender shares underlying the warrant equal to the exercise price as payment of its exercise price, instead of physically exercising the warrant by paying cash. The Company evaluated whether warrants to acquire its common stock contain provisions that protect holders from declines in the stock price or otherwise could result in modification of the exercise price and/or shares to be issued under the respective warrant agreements based on a variable that is not an input to the fair value of a "fixed-for-fixed" option.

The Company recognizes such warrants as liabilities at the fair value on each reporting date. The Company computed the value of the warrants using the binomial method. A summary of quantitative information with respect to the valuation methodology and significant unobservable inputs used for the Company's warrant liabilities that are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 is as follows:

Recurring Level 3 Activity and Reconciliation

The tables below provide a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The table reflects gains and losses for the three month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, for all financial liabilities categorized as Level 3 as of March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, respectively.

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3):

(1)  These warrants were modified on September 30, 2015 and as a result of the modification these warrants met the definition of a derivative and were reclassified to a warrant liability.

Number of Warrants Subject to Remeasurement:

 

Note 11

Stockholders' Equity:

Common Stock and Warrants

Outstanding common stock warrants consist at March 31, 2016 of the following:

Note 12

Stock-based compensation:

At March 31, 2016, the Company had 2,614,600 options outstanding with a weighted-average exercise price of $1.51. 1,664,600 options are vested and exercisable.

Stock-based compensation expense, primarily included in general and administration, for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was $170 and $230, respectively. As of March 31, 2016 there was $488 in unrecognized compensation expense, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.15 years.

Note 13

Income taxes:

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method for deferred income taxes. The provision for income taxes includes federal, state and local income taxes currently payable and deferred taxes resulting from temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized.

Income tax expense of $66 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was comprised of the change in deferred tax liability related to goodwill. Goodwill is an amortizing asset according to tax regulations. This generates a deferred tax liability that is not used to offset deferred tax assets for valuation allowance considerations. There was no such expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Note 14

Business Segments and Geographic Data:

The Company organized its business into three operating segments to better align its organization based upon the Company's management structure, products and services offered, markets served and types of customers, as follows: The Dermatology Recurring Procedures segment derives its revenues from the XTRAC procedures performed by dermatologists. The Dermatology Procedures Equipment segment generates revenues from the sale of equipment, such as lasers and lamp products. The Dermatology Imaging segment generates revenues from the sale and usage of imaging devices. Management reviews financial information presented on an operating segment basis for the purposes of making certain operating decisions and assessing financial performance. On June 22, 2015, the Company acquired the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses and has classified the revenues and expenses of this business to the two Dermatology Procedures segments. There are no corresponding revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

 

Unallocated operating expenses include costs that are not specific to a particular segment but are general to the group; included are expenses incurred for administrative and accounting staff, general liability and other insurance, professional fees and other similar corporate expenses. Interest and other financing income (expense), net is also not allocated to the operating segments.

The following tables reflect results of operations from our business segments for the periods indicated below:

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 (unaudited)

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 (unaudited)

For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 there were no material net revenues attributable to any individual foreign country. Net revenues by geographic area were, as follows:

Note 15

Significant Customer Concentration:

For the three months ended March 31, 2016, revenues from sales to the Company's international master distributor (GlobalMed Technologies) were $1,686, or 22.1%, of total revenues for such period. At March 31, 2016, the accounts receivable balance from GlobalMed Technologies was $443, or 13.6%, of total net accounts receivable. No other customer represented more than 10% of total company revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Note 16

Subsequent Events:

On April 5, 2016, investors converted debentures amounting to $63 into 84,411 shares of common stock. See Note 8, Convertible Debentures.

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes to condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the plans, objectives, expectations and intentions of STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation (referred to in this Report as "we," "us," "our," "STRATA," "STRATA Skin Sciences" or "registrant") and other statements contained in this Report that are not historical facts. When reviewing the discussion below, you should keep in mind the substantial risks and uncertainties that characterize our business. In particular, we encourage you to review the risks and uncertainties described in Item 1A "Risk Factors" included elsewhere in this report, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements contained in this report or implied by past results and trends. Forward-looking statements are statements that attempt to forecast or anticipate future developments in our business, financial condition or results of operations and statements — see "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" that appears at the end of this discussion. These statements, like all statements in this report, speak only as of their date (unless another date is indicated), and we undertake no obligation to update or revise these statements in light of future developments.

The following financial data, in this narrative, are expressed in thousands, except for the earnings per share.

Introduction, Outlook and Overview of Business Operations

STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. ("STRATA" or "we" or the "Company") is a medical technology company dedicated to developing and commercializing innovative products for the diagnosis and treatment of serious dermatological disorders. In June 2015 we completed the acquisition of the XTRAC system and the VTRAC system businesses. The XTRAC and VTRAC products are FDA cleared devices for the treatment of psoriasis, vitiligo and other skin disorders. The purchase price was $42,528 plus the assumption of certain business-related liabilities. These products generated $32,874 in revenues in 2015 with a gross margin of 60.7% on a pro forma basis. Management believes that these businesses acquired create a platform on which to transform STRATA into a leading medical dermatology company. Management further believes that the cash flow generated by these businesses will be sufficient to finance our operations through the second quarter of 2017.

The XTRAC device is utilized to treat psoriasis, vitiligo and other skin diseases. The XTRAC device received FDA clearance in 2000 and has since become a widely recognized treatment among dermatologists. The system delivers targeted 308um ultraviolet light to affected areas of skin, leading to psoriasis clearing and vitiligo repigmentation, following a series of treatments. As of March 31, 2016, there were 730 XTRAC systems placed in dermatologists' offices in the United States under our recurring revenue model, up from 640 at March 31, 2015. Under the recurring revenue model, the XTRAC system is placed in a physician's office and revenue is recognized on a per procedure basis. The XTRAC system's use for psoriasis is covered by nearly all major insurance companies, including Medicare. The VTRAC Excimer Lamp system, offered internationally in addition to the XTRAC, provides targeted therapeutic efficacy demonstrated by excimer technology with the simplicity of design and reliability of a lamp system. There are approximately 7.5 million people in the United States and up to 125 million people worldwide suffering from psoriasis, and 1% to 2% of the world's population suffers from vitiligo. In 2015, over 354,000 XTRAC laser treatments were performed on approximately 22,000 patients in the United States.

The financial results of the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses have been included in the results of operations subsequent to June 22, 2015, the date of the acquisition. The assets of the businesses purchased and liabilities assumed have been consolidated as of June 22, 2015.

MelaFind is a non-invasive, point-of-care (i.e., in the doctor's office) instrument designed to aid in the dermatologists' decision to biopsy pigmented skin lesions, particularly melanoma. The successful commercialization of MelaFind is dependent on many factors, one of which is the establishment of reimbursement policies that include the use of the MelaFind's capabilities to assist in the biopsy decision. Management anticipates that it may require several years of continued effort for insurance companies to establish such policies.

In July 2015, the CPT® Editorial Panel of the American Medical Association posted to the AMA's website the list of Category III codes that became effective January 16, 2016.  These codes included T0400 and T0401, which apply to our MelaFind system. This action followed from our application submitted in July 2014 for a Current Procedural Terminology ("CPT") code, which is necessary for Medicare Part B reimbursement by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS").

Key Technology

Sales and Marketing

As of March 31, 2016, our sales and marketing personnel consisted of 50 full-time positions, inclusive of a direct sales organization as well as an in-house call center staffed with patient advocates and a reimbursement group that provides necessary insurance information to our physician partners and their patients.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There have been no changes to our critical accounting policies in the three months ended March 31, 2016. Critical accounting policies and the significant estimates made in accordance with such policies are regularly discussed with our Audit Committee. Those policies are discussed under "Critical Accounting Policies" in our "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in Item 7, as well as in our consolidated financial statements and the footnotes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC with our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2016.

Results of Operations (The following financial data, in this narrative, are expressed in thousands, except for the earnings per share.)

Revenues

The following table presents revenues from our three segments for the periods indicated below:

We completed the asset purchase of the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses on June 22, 2015 and as such, there are no corresponding revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Recognized treatment revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $5,528, which approximates 74,000 treatments, with prices between $65 to $95 per treatment. Increases in procedures are dependent upon building market acceptance through marketing programs with our physician partners and their patients to show that the XTRAC procedures will be of clinical benefit and will be generally reimbursed by insurers. We have a direct to patient program for XTRAC advertising in the United States targeted at psoriasis and vitiligo patients through a variety of media including television and radio; and through our use of social media such as FaceBook and Twitter. Our advertising expenditures in this area are aimed at reaching the more than 10 million patients in the United States afflicted with these diseases.

We defer substantially all sales of treatment codes ordered by and delivered to the customer within the last two weeks of the period in determining the amount of procedures performed by our physician-customers. Management believes this approach closely approximates the actual amount of unused treatments that existed at the end of a period. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, we deferred net revenues of $160 under this approach.

For the three months ended March 31, 2016 dermatology equipment revenues were $1,990. Internationally, we sold 24 systems for the three months ended March 31, 2016, 17 XTRAC and 7 VTRAC systems.

For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, imaging revenues were $102 and $81, respectively. Imaging revenues are generated from the MelaFind systems, through direct capital equipment sales and through a leasing model. Under the leasing model, there is an upfront installation fee and a monthly usage fee based on the number of lesions examined.

Cost of Revenues

The following table illustrates cost of revenues from our three business segments for the periods listed below:

As we completed the asset purchase of XTRAC and VTRAC businesses on June 22, 2015, there were no corresponding cost of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Gross Profit Analysis

Gross profit increased to $4,198 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 from ($630) during the same period in 2015. As a percentage of revenues, the gross margin was 55.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 from (777.8%) during the same period in 2015.

The following tables analyze changes in our gross margin, by segment, for the periods presented below:

The primary reason for the changes in gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, was the acquisition of the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses on June 22, 2015. The gross profit related to these businesses was allocated to the two Dermatology Procedures segments. There was no corresponding gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Engineering and Product Development

Engineering and product development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased to $525 from $239 for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The increase was due to $373 in engineering and product development expenses related to the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses for the three months ended March 31, 2016. As the XTRAC and VTRAC acquisition was completed on June 22, 2015, there was no corresponding expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015. Offsetting this increase was planned reductions in the ongoing research and development efforts for the MelaFind.

Selling and Marketing Expenses

For the three months ended March 31, 2016, selling and marketing expenses increased to $3,710 from $1,027 for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The increases were related to the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses of $3,619. As the XTRAC and VTRAC acquisition was completed on June 22, 2015, there was no corresponding expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015. Offsetting some of the increases, were decreases in the MelaFind Division primarily related to salary and headcount decreases and overall impact of cost reduction initiatives.

General and Administrative Expenses

For the three months ended March 31, 2016, general and administrative expenses increased to $2,101 from $1,736 for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The changes were due to the acquisition of the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses on June 22, 3015. Some General and Administrative expenses were brought over with this acquisition including finance, IT and other administrative personnel. These increases were offset, in part, by decreases in the MelaFind Division primarily related to salary and headcount changes and other cost reduction initiatives.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $1,218 compared to $2,324 in the three months ended March 31, 2015. Interest expense during the periods of 2016 and 2015 relate to the 4% senior convertible debentures issued in July 2014, which includes amortization of the related debt discount and deferred financing fees. The 2016 period also includes interest expense related to both the senior note and the 2.25% senior convertible debentures issued on June 22, 2015. Additionally, approximately $136 of interest expense was recognized as a result of the conversion of $165 of debentures into common stock during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability

In accordance with FASB ASC 470, "Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options" ("ASC Topic 470") and FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC Topic 820"), we measured the fair value of our warrants that were recorded at their fair value and recognized as liabilities as of March 31, 2016, and recorded $1,985 in other income for the three months ended March 31, 2016. We measured the fair value of these warrants as of March 31, 2015, and recorded $1,334 in other expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Other Income (Expense), net

Other income, net for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $0 compared to $18 for the three months ended March 31, 2015. Other income mainly represents royalty income we earn each quarter from Kavo Dental GmbH on the licensing of certain technology patents.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was $66 compared to $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The expense is comprised of the change in deferred tax liability related to goodwill. Goodwill is an amortizing asset according to tax regulations. This generates a deferred tax liability that is not used to offset deferred tax assets for valuation allowance considerations.

Net Loss

The factors described above resulted in net loss of $1,437 during the three months ended March 31, 2016, as compared to net loss of $7,272 during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Deemed Dividend

We modified the terms of warrants that were set to expire in January 2016, by extending the expiration date by six months. As a result of the modification, we recorded a deemed dividend related to these warrants of $116, which was determined as the difference between the fair value of these warrants immediately before the modification and immediately after. The binomial method was used to value the warrants. 

Non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA

As a result of our acquisition of the XTRAC and VTRAC products, we have determined to supplement our condensed consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP, presented elsewhere within this report, we will provide certain non-GAAP measures of financial performance. These non-GAAP measures include non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA.

We consider these non-GAAP measures in addition to our results prepared under current accounting standards, but they are not a substitute for, nor superior to, GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures are provided to enhance readers' overall understanding of our current financial performance and to provide further information for comparative purposes.

Specifically, we believe the non-GAAP measures provide useful information to management and investors by isolating certain expenses, gains and losses that may not be indicative of our core operating results and business outlook. In addition, we believe non-GAAP measures enhance the comparability of results against prior periods. Reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure of all non-GAAP measures included in this report is as follows:

		For the Three Months Ended March 31,
		2016				2015				Change
Net loss		$	(1,437	)		$	(7,272	)		$	5,835
Adjustments:
Income taxes			66				-				66
Depreciation and amortization			1,684				316				1,368
Interest expense, net			532				139				393
Non-cash interest expense			686				2,185				(1,499	)
EBITDA			1,531				(4,632	)			6,163
Stock-based compensation expense			170				230				(100	)
Change in fair value of warrants			(1,985	)			1,334				(3,319	)
Non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA		$	(284	)		$	(3,068	)		$	2,784

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of March 31, 2016 we had $5,334 of working capital compared to $4,900 as of December 31, 2015. Cash and cash equivalents were $3,120 as of March 31, 2016, as compared to $3,318 as of December 31, 2015.

In June 2015, we raised additional gross proceeds of approximately $42,500 through the issuance of $32,500 of 2.25% senior secured convertible debentures due June 2020, $10,000 of Senior secured notes and warrants to purchase common stock. The debentures are convertible at any time into an aggregate of approximately 43.3 million shares of our common stock at a price of $0.75 per share. Our obligations under the debentures are secured by a subordinated first priority lien on all of our assets. Through the three months of 2016, $165 of debentures were converted into common stock.

On December 30, 2015, the Company entered into a $12,000 credit facility pursuant to a Credit and Security Agreement (the "Agreement") and related financing documents with MidCap Financial Trust ("MidCap") and the lenders listed therein. Under the Agreement, the credit facility may be drawn down in two tranches, the first of which was drawn for $10,500 on December 30, 2015. The proceeds of this first tranche were used to repay $10,000 principal amount of short-term senior secured promissory notes, plus associated interest, loan fees and expenses. The second tranche was drawn for $1,500 on January 29, 2016. The Company's obligations under the credit facility are secured by a first priority lien on all of the Company's assets. Other financing documents included subordination agreements and other amendments with the Company's existing debenture holders from its 2014 and 2015 financings.

We have experienced recurring losses and negative cash flow from operations since inception. We have been dependent on raising capital from the sale of securities in order to continue to operate and to meet our obligations in the ordinary course of business. We believe that our cash as of March 31, 2016 combined with the anticipated revenues from the sale of our products will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital needs, capital asset purchases, outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing operating through the second quarter of 2017.

Net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities was $1,396 for the three months ended March 31 30, 2016 compared to cash used in operating activities of $3,101 for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The primary reason for the change was the lasers placed in service during the period.

Net cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities was $182 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to cash used in investing activities of $100 for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by financing activities was $1,395 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities of $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2015. In the three months ended March 31, 2016, we drew down $1,500 on a long-term debt facility.

Commitments and Contingencies

There were no items, except as described above, that significantly impacted our commitments and contingencies as discussed in the notes to our 2015 annual financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At March 31, 2016, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are subject to the "safe harbor" created by those sections. Forward-looking statements are based on our management's beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "would," "expect," "plan," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "project," "predict," "intend," "potential" and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements, including statements relating to our anticipated revenue streams and our belief that the cash flow generated by these businesses will be sufficient to finance our operations, involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance, time frames or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, time frames or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We discuss many of these risks, uncertainties and other factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, and in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in greater detail under Item 1A. "Risk Factors." Given these risks, uncertainties and other factors, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, these forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this filing. You should read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We hereby qualify our forward-looking statements by our cautionary statements. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

ITEM 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Our exposure to market risk is confined to our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. We invest in high-quality financial instruments, primarily money market funds, with the average effective duration of the portfolio within one year which we believe are subject to limited credit risk. We currently do not hedge interest rate exposure. Due to the short-term nature of our investments, we do not believe that we have any material exposure to interest rate risk arising from our investments. We are exposed to credit risks in the event of default by the financial institutions or issuers of investments in excess of FDIC insured limits. We perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure with any institution.

ITEM 4.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")), as of March 31, 2016. Based on that evaluation, management has concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level described below.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls.

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within an organization have been detected. Accordingly, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of our disclosure control system are met and, as set forth above, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of our disclosure control system were met.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no change in our internal control over financial reporting in our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - Other Information

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time in the ordinary course of our business, we may be involved in certain other legal actions and claims, incidental to the normal course of our business. These may include controversies relating to contract claims and employment related matters, some of which claims may be material in which case we will make separate disclosure as required.

We are not currently in compliance with the $1.00 minimum bid Nasdaq listing requirement. Failure to maintain the listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market could adversely affect us, including our ability to maintain compliance with certain debt covenants and to raise funds.

On April 27, 2016, we received a letter (the "Notice") from the Listing Qualifications Staff of the NASDAQ Stock Market (the "Staff") notifying us that we are not in compliance with the $1.00 minimum closing bid price requirement under the NASDAQ Listing Rules (the "Listing Rules"). The Listing Rules require listed securities to maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share. If a NASDAQ-listed company trades below the minimum bid price requirement for 30 consecutive business days, it is notified of the deficiency. Based upon the Staff's review, we no longer satisfy this requirement. The Listing Rules provide us with a compliance period of 180 calendar days, or until October 24, 2016, to regain compliance with this requirement.

To regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement, we must have a closing bid price of $1.00 per share or more for a minimum of ten consecutive business days during this compliance period. In the event that we do not regain compliance within this period, we may be eligible for additional time to regain compliance by satisfying certain requirements. However, if it appears to the Staff that we will not be able to cure the deficiency, or if we are otherwise not eligible, the Staff will notify us that our common stock will be delisted from the NASDAQ Capital Market. We may appeal the Staff's determination to delist our common stock to a Hearing Panel. During any appeal process, our common stock would continue to trade on the NASDAQ Capital Market. The Notice has no immediate effect on the listing or trading of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market.

We will continue to monitor the closing bid price for our common stock and to assess our options for maintaining the listing of its common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market in light of the Notice. Failure to maintain the listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market could lead to an event of default under the debentures issued in our 2015 financing. Also, if delisting were to occur, selling our common stock could be more difficult because smaller quantities of shares would likely be bought and sold, transactions could be delayed, and security analysts' coverage of us may be reduced. Furthermore, while we believe that our common stock would trade on the OTC Bulletin Board, we would lose various advantages attendant to listing on a national securities exchange, including but not limited to, eligibility to register the sale or resale of our shares on Form S-3 and the automatic exemption from registration under state securities laws for exchange-listed securities, which could have a negative effect on our ability to raise funds.

Other than the risk factor noted above as of March 31, 2016, our other risk factors have not changed materially from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

ITEM 2. Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds

None.

ITEM 3. Defaults upon senior securities.

None.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

ITEM 5. Other Information

None.

ITEM 6.  Exhibits

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Michael R. Stewart, certify that:

(1)

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.;

(2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 

 

 

---

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Christina Allgeier, certify that:

(1)

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.;

(2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION (1)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Michael R. Stewart, the Chief Executive Officer of STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (the "Company"), and Christina Allgeier, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

 

Dated: May 16, 2016

 

 

 

			/s/ Christina Allgeier
			Name: Christina Allgeier
			Title: Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

---