UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

FORM 10 - Q

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016

OR

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to ___________

Commission File Number 0-51481

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (i) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ý  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ý  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)

Yes ☐  No ý

The number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock as of August 11, 2016 was 10,652,804 shares.

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – Financial Information

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

		For the Three Months Ended June 30,
		2016				2015
Revenues		$	7,739			$	611
Cost of revenues			3,139				6,474
Gross profit (loss)			4,600				(5,863	)
Operating expenses:
Engineering and product development			634				282
Selling and marketing			3,523				910
General and administrative			1,901				1,950
			6,058				3,142
Operating loss before other income (expense), net			(1,458	)			(9,005	)
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense, net			(1,178	)			(838	)
Change in fair value of warrant liability			3,199				1,985
Other income, net			(4	)			11
			2,017				1,158
Income (loss) before income taxes			559				(7,847	)
Income tax expense			(61	)			-
Net income (loss)		$	498			$	(7,847	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic		$	0.05			$	(0.97	)
Diluted		$	(0.23	)		$	(1.01	)
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:
Basic			10,589,485				8,067,991
Diluted			11,555,236				9,687,623
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments			2				1
Comprehensive income (loss)		$	500			$	(7,846	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

		For the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2016				2015
Revenues		$	15,359			$	692
Cost of revenues			6,561				7,185
Gross profit (loss)			8,798				(6,493	)
Operating expenses:
Engineering and product development			1,159				521
Selling and marketing			7,233				1,937
General and administrative			4,002				3,686
			12,394				6,144
Operating loss before other income (expense), net			(3,596	)			(12,637	)
Other income (expense), net:
Interest expense, net			(2,396	)			(3,162	)
Change in fair value of warrant liability			5,184				651
Other income, net			(4	)			28
			2,784				(2,483	)
Loss before income taxes			(812	)			(15,120	)
Income tax expense			(127	)			-
Net loss		$	(939	)		$	(15,120	)
Net loss per share:
Basic		$	(0.09	)		$	(2.08	)
Diluted		$	(0.55	)		$	(2.08	)
Shares used in computing net loss per share:
Basic			10,464,571				7,274,358
Diluted			11,080,904				7,274,358
Other comprehensive  loss:
Foreign currency translation adjustments			2				1
Comprehensive loss		$	(937	)		$	(15,119	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands, unaudited)

STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands, unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

Note 1

The Company:

Background

STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (and its subsidiary) ("STRATA" or "we" or the "Company") is a medical technology company dedicated to developing and commercializing innovative products for the diagnosis and treatment of serious dermatological disorders. In June 2015 the Company completed the acquisition of the XTRAC Excimer Laser and the VTRAC excimer lamp businesses from PhotoMedex, Inc. which included a subsidiary in India, PhotoMedex India Ltd. The XTRAC® and VTRAC® products are FDA cleared devices for the treatment of psoriasis, vitiligo and other skin disorders. The purchase price was $42,500 plus the assumption of certain business-related liabilities. (See Note 2, Acquisition.)

The XTRAC is an ultraviolet light excimer laser system utilized to treat psoriasis, vitiligo and other skin diseases. The XTRAC received FDA clearance in 2000 and has since become a recognized treatment among dermatologists. The system delivers targeted 308um ultraviolet light to affected areas of the skin, leading to psoriasis clearing and vitiligo repigmentation, following a series of treatments. As of June 30, 2016, there were 748 XTRAC systems placed in dermatologists' offices in the United States under the Company's recurring revenue business model. The XTRAC systems employed under the recurring revenue model generate revenue on a per procedure basis. The per-procedure charge is inclusive of the use of the system and the services provided by the Company to the customer which includes system maintenance, reimbursement support service and participation in the direct to patient marketing programs employed by the Company. The XTRAC system's use for psoriasis is covered by nearly all major insurance companies, including Medicare. The VTRAC Excimer Lamp system, offered in addition to the XTRAC system internationally, provides targeted therapeutic efficacy demonstrated by excimer technology with the simplicity of design and reliability of a lamp system.

Liquidity

As of June 30, 2016, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $208,179 and has incurred losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception. To date, the Company has dedicated most of its financial resources to research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses.

The Company has been dependent on raising capital from the sale of securities in order to continue to operate and to meet its obligations in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that its cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2016 combined with the anticipated revenues from the sale of the Company's products will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs, capital asset purchases, outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations through the third quarter of 2017.

Basis of Presentation:

Accounting Principles

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP").

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Quarterly Financial Information and Results of Operations

The condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2016 and for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position as of June 30, 2016, the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the statement of stockholders' equity for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and the statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. The results of operations and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 was derived from audited financial statements as of December 31, 2015. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with audited consolidated financial statements and the footnotes thereto, together with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. 

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications from the prior year presentation have been made to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications did not have a material impact on the Company's equity, net assets, results of operations or cash flows.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the US requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates and be based on events different from those assumptions. As of June 30, 2016, the more significant estimates include (1) revenue recognition, including deferred revenues and valuation allowances of accounts receivable, (2) the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the business combination, (3) the estimated useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, (4) the inputs used in determining the fair value of equity-based awards (5) the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets and (6) the fair value of financial instruments, including derivative instruments.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company measures and discloses fair value in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC Topic 820"). ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions there exists a three-tier fair-value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value.

The Company's recurring fair value measurements at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows:

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents are based on their respective demand value, which are equal to the carrying value. The fair value of derivative warrant liabilities is estimated using option pricing models that are based on the individual characteristics of the Company's warrants, preferred and common stock, the derivative warrant liability on the valuation date as well as assumptions for volatility, remaining expected life, risk-free interest rate and, in some cases, credit spread. The derivative warrant liabilities are the only recurring Level 3 fair value measures. The carrying value of all other short-term monetary assets and liabilities is estimated to be approximate to their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company assessed its convertible debentures and long-term debt and determined that the fair value of total debt was $18,890 as of June 30, 2016. As of December 31, 2015 the fair value of total debt approximated the recorded value of $15,958.

Several of the warrants have non-standard terms as they relate to a fundamental transaction and require a net-cash settlement upon change in control of the Company and other warrants contain full ratchet provisions that reduce the exercise price of the warrants in the event of a transaction resulting in the issuance of equity below the current price of the warrants. Therefore these warrants are classified as derivatives. These warrants have been recorded at their fair value using a binomial option pricing model and will be recorded at their respective fair value at each subsequent balance sheet date. See Note 10, Warrants, for additional discussion.

Accrued Warranty Costs

The Company offers a standard warranty on product sales generally for a one to two-year period The Company provides for the estimated cost of the future warranty claims on the date the product is sold. Total accrued warranty is included in Other Accrued Liabilities and Other liabilities on the balance sheet. The activity in the warranty accrual during the six months ended June 30, 2016 is summarized as follows:

Earnings Per Share

Basic net loss per common share excludes dilution for potentially dilutive securities and is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share gives effect to dilutive options, warrants and other potential common shares outstanding during the period and their potential diluted effect is considered using the treasury method.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 diluted earnings per common share are computed by the numerator effected by the gain on the change in fair value of the warrant liability and the denominator is increased to include the number of additional potential common shares from the warrants underlying the warrant liability.

Diluted earnings per common share were calculated using the following net income (loss) and weighted average shares outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and for the three months ended June 30, 2015:

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, diluted net loss per common share is equal to the basic net loss per common share since all potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive.

Potential common stock equivalents outstanding as of June 30, 2016 and 2015 consist of common stock equivalents of common stock purchase warrants, senior secured convertible debentures, convertible preferred stock and common stock options, which are summarized as follows:

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" (Subtopic 835-30). ASU No. 2015-03 provides guidance that will require debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, in the same manner as debt discounts, rather than as an asset. The standard was effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and early adoption was permitted. The Company adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2016. (See Note 9, Convertible Debt.)

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments." The amendments in ASU 2015-16 require that an acquirer recognize adjustments to estimated amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined, rather than retrospectively adjusting amounts previously reported. The amendments require that the acquirer record, in the same period's financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the estimated amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. Effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments should be applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occur after the effective date with earlier application permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718), to simplify various aspects of the accounting and presentation of share-based payments, including the income tax effects of awards and forfeiture assumptions. Currently, tax deductions in excess of compensation costs (excess tax benefits) are recorded in equity and tax deduction shortfalls (tax deficiencies), to the extent of previous excess tax benefits, are recorded in equity and then to income tax expense. Under the new guidance, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies will be recorded to income tax expense in the income statement, which could create volatility in the Company's income statement. The new guidance will also change the classification of excess tax benefits in the cash flow statement and impact the diluted earnings per share calculation. The guidance will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. Different components of the guidance require prospective, retrospective and/or modified retrospective adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, This statement requires lessees to present right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. The standard is effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the guidance will have on its financial condition and results of operations.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes topic of the Codification. This standard requires all deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as non-current on the balance sheet instead of separating deferred taxes into current and non-current amounts. In addition, valuation allowance allocations between current and non-current deferred tax assets are no longer required because those allowances also will be classified as non-current. This standard is effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company's deferred tax assets are provided with full valuation allowance as of December 31, 2015. As such, the Company does not expect that this standard will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures upon adoption.

In May 2014, The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) ("ASU 2014-09"). ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09 also requires entities to disclose sufficient information, both quantitative and qualitative, to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. An entity should apply the amendments in this ASU using one of the following two methods: 1. Retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented with a possibility to elect certain practical expedients, or, 2. Retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application. If an entity elects the latter transition method, it also should provide certain additional disclosures. For a public entity, the amendments in ASU 2014-09 were to be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. In July 2015, the FASB voted for a one year deferral of the effective date of ASU 2014-09 and issued an exposure draft. The new guidance will be effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. Early application is not permitted. The Company is evaluating this standard and expects to have its analysis completed by mid-2017, however, preliminarily the Company does not expect that this new guidance will have a material impact on its revenue recognition.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern ("ASU 2014-15"). ASU 2014-15 provides guidance on management's responsibility in evaluating whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). ASU 2014-15 also provides guidance related to the required disclosures as a result of management evaluation. The amendments in ASU 2014-15 are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of the new guidance will not impact the Company's results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

Note 2

Acquisition:

On June 22, 2015, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement (the "Asset Purchase Agreement") with PhotoMedex Inc. and PhotoMedex Technology, Inc. pursuant to which the Company has purchased the XTRAC and VTRAC laser businesses from PhotoMedex, Inc. (the "Asset Purchase") for $42,528 in cash and assumed certain business-related liabilities. In June 2016, the Company received a return from the escrow account of $125 of the purchase price related to the assets in the purchased Indian subsidiary. The purchased assets include all of the accounts receivable, inventory and fixed and intangible assets of the business.

The fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were based on management's assessment. The significant intangible assets to be recognized in the valuation are core and product technologies, tradenames and customer relationships. The estimated useful lives over which these assets will be amortized, utilizing the straight line method, are five years for product technologies and ten years for core technologies, tradenames and customer relationships. The following allocation of the aggregate fair value is subject to adjustment based on the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. The Company estimated fair value of the intangibles and lasers placed in service was based on the income approach which estimated cash flow that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, known trends and specific market and economic conditions. The fair value of the Company's remaining fixed assets was estimated based on the cost approach which estimated the cost to replace.

The purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net assets acquired by $8,803, which was recorded as goodwill.

The consolidated results of operations do not include any revenues or expenses related to XTRAC and VTRAC businesses on or prior to June 22, 2015, the date of the asset purchase. The Company's unaudited pro-forma results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 summarize the combined results in the following table, assuming the asset purchase had occurred on January 1, 2015 and after giving effect to the acquisition adjustments, including amortization of the tangible and long-lived intangible assets acquired in the transaction:

These unaudited pro-forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the results of operations which would have actually resulted had the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2015, nor to be indicative of future results of operations.

Note 3

Inventories, net:

Work-in-process is immaterial, given the Company's typically short manufacturing cycle, and therefore is disclosed in conjunction with raw materials.

Note 4

Property and Equipment, net:

Depreciation and related amortization expense was $2,415 and $638 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company disposed of leasehold improvements, machinery and equipment and furniture and fixtures with a recorded cost of $3,933 and accumulated depreciation and amortization of $3,809, related to the closing of its Irvington, New York facility. The net book value of $124 was written off to general and administrative expense.

Note 5

Patents and Licensed Technologies, net:

Related amortization expense was $488 and $3 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for amortizable patents and licensed technologies assets for the future periods is as follows:

Note 6

Other Intangible Assets:

Set forth below is a detailed listing of other definite-lived intangible assets:

Related amortization expense was $420 and $ 0 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for the above amortizable intangible assets for the future periods is as follows:

Note 7

Other Accrued Liabilities:

Note 8

Convertible Debentures:

In the following table is a summary of the Company's convertible debentures.

The Company issued $32,500 aggregate principal amount of Debentures (June 2015 Debentures) that, subject to certain ownership limitations and stockholder approval conditions, will be convertible into 43,333,334 shares of Company common stock at an initial conversion price of $0.75 per share. The Debentures bear interest at the rate of 2.25% per year, and, unless previously converted, will mature on the five-year anniversary of the date of issuance, June 22, 2020.

The June 2015 Debentures include a beneficial conversion feature valued at $27,300 that was recorded as a discount to the debentures. On the date of issuance the beneficial conversion feature value was calculated as the difference resulting from subtracting the conversion price of $0.75 from $1.38, the opening market value of the Company's common stock following the announcement of the transaction, multiplied by the number of common shares into which the June 2015 Debentures are convertible. This discount is being amortized over the five year life of the June 2015 Debentures using the effective interest method. The embedded conversion feature contains an anti-dilution provision that allows for downward exercise price adjustments in certain situations. The embedded conversion feature was not bifurcated as it did not meet all of the elements of a derivative.

On July 21, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive Securities Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") with institutional investors (the "Investors") providing for the issuance of Senior Secured Convertible Debentures in the aggregate principal amount of $15,000, due, subject to the terms therein, in July 2019 (the "July 2014 Debentures"), and warrants (the "July 2014 Series A Warrants") to purchase up to an aggregate of 6,198,832 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, at an exercise price of $2.45 per share expiring in July 2019. The July 2014 Debentures bear interest at an annual rate of 4%, payable quarterly or upon conversion into shares of common stock. The Debentures are convertible at any time into an aggregate of 5,847,955 shares of common stock at an initial conversion price of $2.565 per share. The Company's obligations under the July 2014 Debentures are secured by a first priority lien on all of the Company's intellectual property pursuant to the terms of a security agreement ("Security Agreement") dated July 21, 2014 among the Company and the Investors. In connection with the Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the Investors pursuant to which the Company was obligated to file a registration statement to register for resale the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock (See Note 10, Warrants) and Debentures and upon exercise of the Warrants. Under the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company filed a registration statement on August 19, 2014, which was declared effective by the SEC on October 20, 2014 (File No. 333-198249).

For financial reporting purposes, the $15,000 funded by the Investors on July 21, 2014 was allocated first to the fair value of the obligation to issue the Warrants, amounting to $5,296, then to the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature on the July 2014 Debentures of $4,565. The balance was further reduced by the fair value of warrants issued to the placement agent for services rendered of $491, resulting in an initial carrying value of the Debentures of $4,647. The initial debt discount on the July 2014 Debentures totaled $10,353 and is being amortized using the effective interest method over the five year life of the July 2014 Debentures.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the investors converted June 2015 debentures amounting to $248 into 329,411 shares of common stock. The debt discount and deferred financing cost adjustment resulting from the conversions increased interest expense by $202 for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

As a condition of the new note facility (See Note 9, Long-term Debt) the Debentures from both the 2014 and 2015 financings were amended. The Debentures holders' first priority lien was subordinated to the new term note facility. Additionally, as a condition of the term note facility, the maturity date of both Debentures was extended to June 30, 2021. The Company evaluated the modifications to determine if there was an extinguishment of debt. Based on the valuation, the discounted cash flows did not change by more than 10%, thus they were treated as a modification.

As of June 30, 2016, the total outstanding amount of Debentures was $40,746.

Note 9

Long-term Debt:

Term-Note Credit Facility

On December 30, 2015, the Company entered into a $12,000 credit facility pursuant to a Credit and Security Agreement (the "Agreement") and related financing documents with MidCap Financial Trust ("MidCap") and the lenders listed therein. Under the Agreement, the credit facility may be drawn down in two tranches, the first of which was drawn for $10,500 on December 30, 2015. The proceeds of this first tranche were used to repay $10,000 principal amount of short-term senior secured promissory notes, plus associated interest, loan fees and expenses. The second tranche was drawn for $1,500 on January 29, 2016. The Company's obligations under the credit facility are secured by a first priority lien on all of the Company's assets. This credit facility includes both financial and non-financial covenants, including a minimum net revenue covenant, beginning in January 2016. The Company is in compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2016. On August 9, 2016, the minimum net revenue covenant was amended prospectively. The Interest rate on the credit facility is one month LIBOR plus 8.25%, subject to a LIBOR floor of 0.5%. The Company's existing debentures from its 2014 and 2015 financings were amended as a condition of this new term note facility, including subordination agreements and maturity extensions. Unamortized discount on the long term debt was $655 and $649 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. As of June 30, 2016 the net balance of long-term debt is $11,345.

In connection with the issuance of the Term Note the Company issued MidCap (and the lenders), on December 30, 2015, a warrant to purchase 650,442 shares of the Company's common stock for an exercise price of $1.13. Additionally, the Company issued MidCap (and the lenders), on January 29, 2016, a warrant to purchase 99,057 shares of the Company's common stock for an exercise price of $1.06. The warrants are exercisable at any time on or prior to the fifth anniversary of its issue date. The warrants are treated as a discount to the debt and are accreted under the effective interest method over the repayment term of 60 months. The Company has accounted for these warrants as equity instruments since there is no option for cash or net-cash settlement when the warrants are exercised and since they are indexed to the Company's common stock. The Company computed the value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes method. The key assumptions used to value the warrants are as follows:

Note 10

Warrants:

The Company accounts for warrants that have provisions that protect holders from a decline in the issue price of its common stock (or "down-round" provisions) as liabilities instead of equity. Down-round provisions reduce the exercise or conversion price of a warrant or convertible instrument if a company either issues equity shares for a price that is lower than the exercise or conversion price of those instruments or issues new warrants or convertible instruments that have a lower exercise or conversion price. Net settlement provisions allow the holder of the warrant to surrender shares underlying the warrant equal to the exercise price as payment of its exercise price, instead of physically exercising the warrant by paying cash. The Company evaluated whether warrants to acquire its common stock contain provisions that protect holders from declines in the stock price or otherwise could result in modification of the exercise price and/or shares to be issued under the respective warrant agreements based on a variable that is not an input to the fair value of a "fixed-for-fixed" option. As of June 22, 2016, the down-round provision expired on 12,083,821 warrants and as such these warrants were reclassified to equity.

For those that do contain such provisions, the Company recognizes the warrants as liabilities at the fair value on each reporting date. The Company computed the value of the warrants using the binomial method. A summary of quantitative information with respect to the valuation methodology and significant unobservable inputs used for the Company's warrant liabilities that are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2016, June 22, 2016 and December 31, 2015 is as follows:

Recurring Level 3 Activity and Reconciliation

The tables below provide a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the liability measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The table reflects gains and losses for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, for all financial liabilities categorized as Level 3 as of June 30, 2016 and, 2015, respectively.

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3):

Number of Warrants Subject to Remeasurement:

Note 11

Stockholders' Equity:

Common Stock and Warrants

Common stock warrants outstanding at June 30, 2016 consist of the following:

Note 12

Stock-based compensation:

At June 30, 2016, the Company had 3,009,252 common stock options outstanding with a weighted-average exercise price of $1.50. 1,939,752 common stock options are vested and exercisable.

Stock-based compensation expense, primarily included in general and administration, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was $116 and $286, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 stock-based compensation was $246 and $476 respectively. As of June 30, 2016 there was $406 in unrecognized compensation expense, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 4 years.

Note 13

Income taxes:

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method for deferred income taxes. The provision for income taxes includes federal, state and local income taxes currently payable and deferred taxes resulting from temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized.

Income tax expense of $61 and $127 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was comprised of the change in deferred tax liability related to goodwill. Goodwill is an amortizing asset according to tax regulations. This generates a deferred tax liability that is not used to offset deferred tax assets for valuation allowance considerations. There was no such expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.

Note 14

Business Segments and Geographic Data:

The Company organized its business into three operating segments to better align its organization based upon the Company's management structure, products and services offered, markets served and types of customers, as follows: The Dermatology Recurring Procedures segment derives its revenues from the XTRAC procedures performed by dermatologists. The Dermatology Procedures Equipment segment generates revenues from the sale of equipment, such as lasers and lamp products. The Dermatology Imaging segment generates revenues from the sale and usage of imaging devices. Management reviews financial information presented on an operating segment basis for the purposes of making certain operating decisions and assessing financial performance. On June 22, 2015, the Company acquired the XTRAC and VTRAC businesses and has classified the revenues and expenses of this business to the two Dermatology Procedures segments.

Unallocated operating expenses include costs that are not specific to a particular segment but are general to the group; included are expenses incurred for administrative and accounting staff, general liability and other insurance, professional fees and other similar corporate expenses. Interest and other financing income (expense), net is also not allocated to the operating segments.

The following tables reflect results of operations from our business segments for the periods indicated below:

Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 (unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 (unaudited)

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 (unaudited)

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 there were no material net revenues attributable to any individual foreign country. Net revenues by geographic area were, as follows: